4.1 Differentiate
between research and evaluation.
When differentiating between
research and evaluation one must know what they mean. Research produces
generalizable knowledge, scientific inquiry based on intellectual curiosity, advances
broad knowledge and theory and controlled setting while evaluation judges merit
or worth, policy & program interests of stakeholders paramount, provides
information for decision-making on specific program, conducted within setting
of changing actors, priorities, resources, & timeline.
4.2 Define evaluation.
Evaluation,
as contrasted to research is the systematic investigation of the worth or merit
of an object. Evaluation of programs is used to identify strengths and
weaknesses well as the benefits and drawbacks of teaching and learning online.
There are five steps when discussing evaluation and distance education which
are reactions(did they like it), learning(did they learn it), transfer(will
they use it)results(will it matter) and return on investment.
4.3 Explain the six categories of evaluation information: in
measures of activity, efficiency, outcomes, program aims, policy, and
organizations.
The six categories of evaluation
information are measures in activity (questions such as how many courses were
produced and how many students were served), efficiency (questions include how
many students successfully completed the course and what was the average
students workload how much did the course cost), outcomes (measures of adequate
learning and documenting the borrowing and use of courses and course materials),
program aims (surveys of learners), policy and organizations (evaluation).
4.4 Describe the AEIOU approach to evaluation and its five
levels—
accountability, effectiveness, impact, organizational.
Accountability is defined as did the
project planners do what they said they were going to do, effectiveness is how
well done was the project, impact is did
the project, course, or program make a difference, organizational context which
means what structures, policies or events in the organization or environment helped
or hindered the project in accomplishing its goals and unanticipated
consequences which is what changes or consequences of importance happened as a
result of the project that was not expected.